Ing Ibrahim Abdulai Sawaneh

IBRAHIM ABDULAI SAWANEH

DIRECTOR OF ACADEMIC AFFAIRS - IAMTECH

AUTHOR: IBRAHIM ABDULAI SAWANEH, DIRECTOR OF ACADEMIC AFFAIRS AT THE INSTITUTION OF ADVANCED MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY - IAMTECH

19th December, 2018

ABSTRACT

Human Resource Management (HRM) plays vital role in educational institutions. HRM is an essential ingredient for changing the scope and dynamism in evaluating worker’s performance. Performance appraisal permits institution to supervise their employee’s performance relating to competencies, punctuality, pedigree and potentials. Ignoring effective performance appraisal system results to low work output. Institutional objectives can be achieved by effectively applying performance appraisal system with diverse positive outcomes and diligently monitoring both academic and administrative staff of the Institute of Advanced Management and Technology (IAMTECH) Sierra Leone. Effective performance management and appraisal system has ultimately improved staff performance and influenced their potentials in thinking, and doing work. Importantly, it brings benefits to employer and employee by creating a plain level ground for both parties. Furthermore, performance appraisal system delivers a complete assessment of staff performance at IAMTECH. However the researchers established dissatisfaction with some appraisal processes, such as management not backing the appraisal process, authorities are not questioned for not completing their appraisal process on time, and the absence of performance appraisal workshop/seminar/training provided to the staff at IAMTECH and more importantly, the performance appraisal system is done yearly at IAMTECH. IAMTECH uses rating scale, descriptive system and management by objective methods to evaluate their employees. Noting that management by objective is the most widely used method and hence, our method of effective performance appraisal system has created positive influence on job performance at IAMTECH.

KEYWORDS

Feedback, Theory, HRM, Performance Appraisal System; Prejudice, Perception

REFERENCES

[1] Donkor et al (2010), “Teach yourself research methods”: (2nd edn) Kumasi printing press 

[2] Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA:
[3] Patten, T. H. (1977). Pay: Employee compensation and incentive plans. New York: The Free Press. 
[4] Lopez, F.M. (1968). Evaluating Employee Performance. Chicago, Illinois: Public Personnel Association. 
[5] Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. (1991). Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. 
[6] Scott, W. D., Clothier, R. C., & Spriegel, W. R. (1961). Personnel management: Principles, practices, and point of view (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. 
[7] Bellows, R. M., & Estep, M. F. (1954). Employment psychology: The interview. New York: Rinehart. 
[8] Fletcher, C. (1994). Performance appraisal in context: Organizational changes and their impact on practice. 
[9] Bernardin, H. J., & Beatty, R. W. (1984). Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work. Boston: Kent. 
[10] Martin, D. C., Bartol, K. M., & Kehoe, P. E. (2000). The legal ramifications of performance appraisal: The growing significance. Public Personnel Management, 29(3), 379. 
[11] Randi, Toler, Sachs (1992). The worksmart series: Productive performance appraisals. 
[12] Mani, B. G. (2002). Performance appraisal systems, productivity, and motivation: A case study. Public Personnel Management, 31(2), 141 
[13] Einstein, W. O. and LeMere-Labonte, J. (1989). 
Performance appraisal: dilemma or desire? Sam Advanced Management Journal, 54 (2): 26-30. 
[14] Bue W.L. and Byars L.L. (2005, 11th edition) Management: Skills and Application: McGrawHill/ Irwin Inc.

Leave a Reply